It bothers me how the currency in sci fi is always “credits”; if I wrote a sci fi story, the universal currency would be Australian dollars, even if it’s set in space, with no Australian people, or any indication that this universe ever had a place called Australia in it.
the hero we deserve
that’s 30,000 space dollarydoos
Author: Goldpanner
did the ppl who made ice age forget after the first movie that human beings canonically exist in their world im just wondering
y’know with all these sequels i expected them to reunite with the baby they saved in the first movie as an adult or something but at this rate they’re more likely to meet a seven-headed turtle-squid with a punny name voiced by pitbull
the calming purple of azlyrics
Last night I was talking to my boyfriend, and I couldn’t think of the word ‘library’, so I said ‘book ranch’. He thought it was hilarious and started making up alternative names for ‘librarian’.
“Cowbook! Like cowboy! No…Readcher? Like Rancher? No, fuck this is hard…”
and just now I heard him yell “BOOKAROO” from the other end of the apartment in the most triumphant tone of voice i’ve ever heard
Disney Princesses as Pokemon Trainers
Pixel Artist: Bruno Moraes
Source: bbrunomoraes.deviantart.com / bbrunomoraes.tumblr.com
goin home to be ugly in peace is one of my fav things to do
I’m glad that when I was growing up the prevailing culture was lying about your age on the internet, and just trying to be cool and fit in with everybody else who may or may not have also been pretending to be adults.
I wrote my PhD dissertation on the social function of humor (in literature & film) and here’s the thing about “just joking.” You’re never “just joking.” Nobody is ever “just joking.” Humor is a social act that performs a social function (always). To say humor is social act is to say it is always in social context; we don’t joke alone. Humor is a way we relate/interact with others.
Which is to say, humor is a way we construct identity – who we are in relation to others. We use humor to form groups and to find our individual place in or out of those groups. In short, joking/humor is one tool by which we assimilate or alienate. IOW, we use humor to bring people into – or keep them out of – our social groups. This is what humor *does.* What it’s for.
Consequently, how we use humor is tied up with ethics – who do we embrace, who do we shun, and how/why? And the assimilating/alienating function of humor works not only only people but also on *ideas.* This is important. This is why, e.g., racist “jokes” are bad. Not just because they serve to alienate certain people, but also because they serve to assimilate the idea of racism (the idea of alienating people based on their race).
And so we come to Trump. A racist joke sends a message to the in-group that racism is acceptable. (If you don’t find it acceptable, you’re in the out-group.) he racist joke teller might say “just joking” – but this is a *defense* to the out-group. He doesn’t have to say this to the in-group. This is why we’re never “just joking.” To the in-group, no defense of the joke is needed; the idea conveyed is accepted/acceptable.
So, when Trump jokes about assassination or armed revolt, he’s asking the in-group to assimilate/accept that idea. That’s what jokes do. And when he says “just joking,” that’s a defense offered to the out-group who was never meant to assimilate the idea in the first place. Indeed, circling back to the start, the joke *itself* is a way to define in-group and out-group, through assimilation & alienation.
If you’re willing to accept “just joking” as defense, you’re willing to enter in-group where idea conveyed by the joke is acceptable. IOW, if “just joking” excuses racist jokes, then in-group has accepted idea of racism as part of being in-group. Same goes for “jokes” about armed revolt or assassinating Hillary Clinton. They cannot be accepted as “just joking.”
Now, a big caveat: humor (like all language) is complicated and always a matter of interpretation. For example, we might have racist humor that is, in fact, designed to alienate (rather than assimilate) the idea of racism. (Think satire or parody.) But I think it’s pretty clear Trump was not engaging in some complex satirical form of humor. He was “just joking.” In the worst sense.
Bottom line: don’t accept “just joking” as excuse for what Trump said today. The in-group for that joke should be tiny. Like his hands.
callanswall 